31/12/2025
So, the results are in on the 5 bed, 280m2 Victorian house, and the results may be surprising. Long story short, the heat loss is around 12.5kW, or just under 45w/2. This house has solid uninsulated 9” brickwork, solid uninsulated floors, uninsulated tile clad timber framed 2nd floor with lathe and plaster internal walls, and a leaky front door. Fabric upgrades are limited to loft insulation where possible, and double glazed windows. The Vitocal 150-A is maintaining 21-22° internal temperature, at -2.4° outside temp (both figures 1° above design), however the flow temp is around 10° below design, proving how far out the whole methodology is. The backup heater did come on in the middle of the night, when the desired indoor temp jumped from 20° to 23° (to take advantage of the off-peak tariff), but only used 1.6kWh of electricity, about 11p worth at that time of day. Sticking to CIBSE design guidelines on this job would have increased the install cost by around £15k, making it entirely untenable and meaning the gas boiler would have remained in use. By looking at actual gas consumption at design conditions, we were able to specify correctly, save around £15k from the install cost, reduce CO2 emissions by around 6 tonnes per year, plus NOT fit loads of extraneous components, each with their own embedded carbon. This strengthens the case for using monitoring and measuring existing heat sources, rather than traditional heat loss survey methods, especially on older properties.