03/24/2026
What has always struck me is how differently we think about housing in the U.S. versus Portugal.
In Portugal, and in many parts of Europe, homes were traditionally built with masonry, stone, concrete, and other mineral materials meant to last. A house was not just a product. It was something expected to age with dignity, hold family life, and remain standing for generations.
In the U.S., residential construction evolved very differently. The system favored speed, cost efficiency, and large-scale repetition. Wood framing became the norm not necessarily because it was the most lasting solution, but because it was the fastest and most economical system to scale.
That difference matters.
Because when a house is treated primarily as a market product, durability often becomes secondary. Longevity becomes optional. Materials are chosen for immediate efficiency, not for how they will weather over decades.
This is one of the reasons I keep thinking about the idea of the Forever Home.
A home should not be designed only for short-term ownership.
It should be designed to support life over time.
It should age well.
It should carry memory.
It should feel grounded, protective, and lasting.
For me, architecture is not just about building faster.
It is about building with enough intelligence, restraint, and integrity that a home can still feel meaningful many years later.
That is the kind of house I believe we need more of.