23/08/2023
https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/is-the-ms-decision-a-climate-crisis-turning-point?eea=*EEA*&eea=SElEQ204S0ZnVVMrc2lRRzlham5pU2ExZ1BTc0VuN2dLUWtybVJOUmIyaz0%3D&utm_source=acs&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=FABS_AJ_EDI_REGS_DAILY_230823&deliveryName=DM166943
This is very interesting, including in relation to current non-prioritisation of retrofit of housing older than 1940 by government. This about to close to one-fifth of existing housing stock.
Nor is it realistic to assume that every property would reach a level of thermal efficiency which would allow installation of a heat pump. This is not realistic. There's no one-line solution; this is simply lazy thinking. The aim should be to maximise thermal efficiency in all houses, including through thermal upgrading on a phased basis. Current policy and grant systems most certainly do not support this, which is a realistic and pragmatic approach.
I'm calling for all thermal retrofitting to be tax-deductible. If this government is serious about improving thermal efficiency it ought to be; otherwise it is well beyond the reach of many people, and will continue to remain so. This many require dispensing with a whole-building approach other than on a phased basis, and possibly for older houses. Sometimes they are very prudent in terms of siting and aspect, with fewer and smaller winds on north elevations, and heavy wall which can become a thermal store with external insulation. To the best of my knowledge there is no teaching on retrofit in schools or architecture; the focus remains on new-build. This is blind stupidity. I would love to be corrected.
Last month, communities secretary Michael Gove made what many are calling a ‘watershed decision’ by ...