03/31/2026
I’m torn here, but not really. It’s always that wonder…some designers don’t do this, and that’s totally fine, but why am I doing it?
Today was paint color selection day for our clients’ repurposed furniture pieces.
Here’s the story:
The clients from one of our new construction projects told us they wanted “all new” furniture and that they didn’t want to take anything from their current home because it wasn’t the look they were going for. Fast forward through all of the new-build decisions and here we are at the furniture phase and I’m like, guys, your existing furniture is really good quality - solid wood and sturdy, you own it already, like want to just use it? But...we’ll have it all refinished to give it a new life so it goes from drab to fab? Whaddaya say?
Enter .with.her.hands and , some heavy lifting and here we are at paint color selection day.
We will be repurposing TWO king beds, TWO nightstands, TWO side tables, ONE giant, gorgeous armoire that will become linen storage in the second floor powder room / laundry room and ONE chest of drawers.
We didn’t have to do it this way, but why not!? I can spec, order, deliver and install furniture in my sleep, but why...when the pieces had good bones! There is a cost savings here to say the least, but we also saved fuel, materials, packaging, etc., so came into play as well. We’ve given some solid work to a local craftswoman extraordinaire too.
As a designer, am I supposed to do this? Some would say no. Poopoo to existing pieces, it must all be MY choice, but we’re not like that around here. We’re a high/low project kinda people. Some pieces cost thousands, some pieces cost hundreds and others you can already own.
This will give the house a little character, a little history and keep some of the clients’ existing furniture in the rotation. Is “ALL NEW” soul-less? I mean, dare I say...maybe?
Even if pieces aren’t the clients’ own, do you mix new and old, high and low on your projects?